What AI does here
We use AI tools to help draft and research the content on this site — outlining a guide, gathering public sources, tightening a rough paragraph. That’s genuinely useful, and pretending otherwise would be its own kind of dishonesty.
What AI does not do is decide what’s true. It’s a writing and research assistant working inside rules people set. It doesn’t get the last word, and it doesn’t get published unreviewed.
Humans set the rules
Every constraint that matters is set and enforced by people:
- Which figures are allowed. Price ranges come only from sources we’ve approved and listed — the specifics are on our data methodology page. A model can’t introduce a number from outside that set.
- Which sources can be cited. We work from an approved list of public data sources. AI can help pull from them; it can’t invent a source or a URL to make a claim look grounded.
- What counts as a Mindhyv product claim. Only things the product actually does today. A model doesn’t get to promise a feature into existence.
No invented statistics, ever
This is the line we don’t cross: no statistic, percentage, survey result, or “studies show” on this site was generated by an AI making it up. If a model produces a confident-sounding number we can’t trace to a real source, it doesn’t ship. Fabricated data is exactly the failure mode we built these rules to catch.
Mindhyv is a young marketplace with no platform data of its own yet, and we won’t let a tool paper over that with invented figures.
Humans review, and humans own it
Before any page publishes, a person reviews it against the rules above and signs off. When something’s wrong, a person fixes it and it’s noted in the open — no “the AI wrote it” excuse. The mechanics are on our corrections policy, and the broader standards for who writes and what gets published are in our editorial policy.
The short version: AI helps us work faster; it never lets us work looser. Accountability stays with people, which is the only place it belongs.